CJI D.Y. Chandrachud Emphasizes Importance of Open Communication Between Judicial Officers and High Court Judges

(Judicial Quest News Network)

02, Sep 2024

During the two-day National Conference of the District Judiciary, Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud addressed the critical issue of bridging the communication gap between district judiciary officials and High Court judges. Speaking at the event, CJI Chandrachud highlighted that the perceived communication gap is a relic of colonial times, rooted in historical subordination.

The CJI pointed out that these gaps are often observed in interactions between inspecting or administrative judges and the assessment of judicial officers. He emphasized that fostering collegiality, where authority is shared willingly among colleagues, is essential for an open, frank, and holistic communication environment. This, he argued, is crucial for achieving fair transfer policies, equitable distribution of work, and transparency in judicial action and assessment. CJI Chandrachud stressed that evaluating judicial officers should be based on long-term performance data rather than short-term inspections. He underscored the importance of instilling a sense of ownership and belonging among district judiciary members, who should be evaluated based on their sustained and consistent performance.

In his address, the CJI also outlined three key inclusivity measures to uphold equality and justice within the judiciary. These include:

1. Implementing a comprehensive framework for gender equality in decision-making.
2. Recruiting, training, retaining, and promoting individuals from diverse and vulnerable groups.
3. Monitoring and evaluating gender equality initiatives within the judiciary.

Furthermore, CJI Chandrachud emphasized the need to openly address mental health issues and the emotional well-being of judicial officers. He noted that the mental and emotional health of judicial officers directly impacts their efficiency in delivering justice and maintaining public confidence in the judicial system. The CJI argued that judicial wellness is not merely a personal concern but a democratic imperative essential for upholding the rule of law.

Regarding the new curriculum for judicial training, the CJI mentioned that the Centre for Research and Development of the Supreme Court is preparing a white paper to integrate state-level training modules with national and international best practices. The Centre is working on establishing a comprehensive nationwide curriculum for judicial training that leverages technology to monitor judicial progress. The revised curriculum will focus on innovative training methods, thematic frameworks, uniformity in training calendars, and the integration of information technology. Additionally, it will aim to address knowledge gaps through improved feedback and assessment methodologies.

In conclusion, CJI Chandrachud highlighted the need for better working conditions for judicial officers, ensuring their independence and freedom are not compromised by financial constraints. He underscored that providing favorable working conditions in the district judiciary is a modest price to pay for safeguarding judicial independence and impartiality. Financial insecurity within the judiciary poses a significant threat to a stable democratic society.

Recalling a previous emphasis by President Droupadi Murmu on not incarcerating individuals for minor offenses, the CJI expressed hope that young judges would develop a sense of independence and confidence, free from fear. The event was also attended by President Droupadi Murmu, Justice Suryakant, and Union Minister of Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal.